BREAKING: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Under Federal Investigation After SHOCK Discovery
Washington D.C. — Border Czar Tom Homan has referred Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) for federal investigation. The referral concerns allegations that the congresswoman hired an undocumented immigrant as a staff member and provided guidance to others on avoiding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
Homan stated that the case involves two potential issues: hiring an unauthorized immigrant and assisting individuals in evading ICE enforcement. He told conservative podcaster Benny Johnson that the matter has been referred to the appropriate agencies for further review.
The individual named in the allegations is Diego de la Vega, who worked as Deputy Communications Director for Ocasio-Cortez starting in 2022. De la Vega had previously been involved in political advocacy, including support for the DREAM Act, and had held other congressional staff roles despite his immigration status.
Ocasio-Cortez has also held “Know Your Rights” webinars aimed at undocumented immigrants. The sessions, conducted in English and Spanish, included legal advice on interactions with ICE. Materials distributed during the webinars advised individuals not to open doors without a judicial warrant and provided information on obtaining free legal assistance.
Homan emphasized that the investigation focuses on whether the actions crossed into willful obstruction of removal proceedings. He noted that such conduct could violate federal law. When asked about the possibility of an undocumented individual gaining access to congressional offices or classified material, Homan stated that such a situation would not be permissible and would be addressed if confirmed.
Ocasio-Cortez has denied any wrongdoing. She described the referral as politically motivated and asserted that her webinars were protected under the First Amendment as an exercise in informing constituents of their constitutional rights. She said she had sent an official letter seeking clarification on the status of any investigation but had not received a response.
The case has drawn attention to broader questions about hiring practices in congressional offices and the boundaries of legislative advocacy regarding immigration enforcement. No charges have been filed at this time, and the investigation remains ongoing.
Federal authorities have not released additional details on the scope or timeline of the probe. Ocasio-Cortez has continued to defend her actions as consistent with providing accurate legal information to affected communities.
WOW! - Calls Explode for Bill Barr's Arrest After Chilling Anti- Trump Discovery
Washington D.C. — A whistleblower has alleged that former Attorney General William Barr conspired with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to pursue charges against former President Donald Trump.
Patricia Lélis, who worked for media personality Armstrong Williams’ public relations firm in 2021, claimed she attended dozens of meetings in Washington, D.C., between 2021 and 2023. She said the meetings involved Barr, Willis, and others, including Armstrong Williams.
Lélis provided Project Veritas with boxes of handwritten notes from the meetings. She alleged the group discussed legal strategies to obstruct Trump ahead of the 2024 election.
According to her notes, one meeting on September 6, 2021, included Barr and CNN commentator Shermichael Singleton. The group reportedly developed a media strategy to complement Congress’ January 6 investigation.
Lélis said Barr identified additional targets, including Steve Bannon, Rudy Giuliani, Stewart Rhodes, Enrique Tarrio, Jeffrey Clark, the Oath Keepers, and the Proud Boys. Most of these individuals later received subpoenas to testify before the January 6 committee.
Photos from March 15, 2022, show Barr entering Sinclair Broadcast Group, where he reportedly met with Willis and federal prosecutor Jack Smith. The meeting allegedly discussed impending charges Smith planned to file against Trump in Florida regarding classified documents.
Lélis recorded Barr predicting at the meeting that an FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago would happen “soon.” Five months later, agents raided Trump’s residence.
Meeting notes from January 19, 2023, indicate that Barr and Willis planned to meet again. Notes from February 27, 2023, confirm the meeting occurred. Lélis claimed Barr advised Willis to pursue RICO charges against Trump during that meeting.
Lélis told Project Veritas that Barr described racketeering charges as complicated and difficult to challenge under U.S. law. She said the primary objective of the meetings was to prevent Trump from returning to the presidency.
Lélis also alleged that Willis collaborated with a social media team to create “anti-Trump” posts and other content aimed at bolstering the prosecution.
Barr has not publicly responded to the allegations. Willis has previously denied any improper coordination in her cases.
The claims have renewed discussion about the origins of the Georgia election-related RICO charges against Trump and 18 co-defendants. The investigation into those charges remains ongoing in Fulton County.
Federal and congressional inquiries into the matter have not been announced at this time.
Gabbard Declassifies Docs Behind Trump's First Impeachment - Adam Schiff Should Be Arrested
Washington D.C. — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has declassified documents concerning the whistleblower complaint that led to the 2019 impeachment proceedings against then-President Donald Trump. The materials provide additional details about the origins and handling of the complaint.
The documents indicate that the whistleblower was a registered Democrat who had worked closely with then-Vice President Joe Biden on Ukraine-related issues. The whistleblower expressed dislike for certain conservative figures associated with the Trump administration, including former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and current FBI Director Kash Patel.
Investigators noted that the whistleblower’s allegations were based on second- and third-hand accounts. The whistleblower admitted in an intake form that he did not have direct knowledge of private comments or communications by the president.
Records show the whistleblower had prior contact with then-Rep. Adam Schiff, who chaired the House Intelligence Committee at the time. This contact was not initially disclosed to investigators. The whistleblower later apologized for the omission when evidence of the interaction emerged in media reports.
A witness referred to as “Witness 2” disclosed connections to former FBI agent Peter Strzok. This witness had co-authored a 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference. The witness supported the whistleblower but expressed reservations about the strength of the allegations and said he would not have taken independent action based on the available information.
Investigators raised questions about the whistleblower’s potential political bias during the review process. The documents also indicate the whistleblower requested that Nunes not view the disclosure, despite Nunes being a member of the Gang of Eight entitled to such information.
The declassified records were previously kept confidential. They were released at the request of Just the News and provide context on the intelligence community’s assessment of the complaint.
The 2019 impeachment centered on allegations that Trump improperly pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate Hunter Biden. Democrats argued the request amounted to a quid pro quo tied to U.S. military aid. Trump and his allies rejected that characterization and said the call was appropriate.
The declassification has renewed discussion about the handling of the whistleblower complaint and the role of congressional figures in the impeachment process.
Pathetic Obama Makes SICK Comment About Trump After WHCD Shooting
Washington D.C. — Former President Barack Obama issued a statement on X regarding the shooting incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. In the post, Obama said that while details about the motives behind the shooting are not yet known, it is important for all Americans to reject violence in democracy.
Obama expressed gratitude to U.S. Secret Service agents for their courage and sacrifice. He noted that the agent who was shot is expected to recover. The statement came shortly after the incident involving suspect Cole Allen, a 31-year-old computer scientist from Torrance, California.
Allen was taken into custody at the scene. Authorities said he rushed a Secret Service checkpoint while armed. He opened fire on a Secret Service officer, who was struck in his ballistic vest. Agents returned fire. Allen was not hit but was taken to a hospital for evaluation.
United States Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro announced that Allen has been charged with two counts: using a firearm during a crime of violence and assault on a federal officer with a dangerous weapon. Additional charges are expected as the investigation continues.
Federal agencies, including the FBI and Secret Service, are reviewing Allen’s background, digital footprint, and communications. A manifesto reportedly sent by Allen to his family referenced anti-Trump accusations. Officials have not publicly confirmed a motive.
The shooting occurred during one of Washington’s most prominent annual events, which draws journalists, political figures, and public officials. Emergency responders arrived quickly following reports of gunfire. Law enforcement secured the area and ensured the safety of those in attendance.
Obama’s statement emphasized the need to reject violence regardless of political differences. Critics questioned the timing and tone of the comment, suggesting it did not fully address the manifesto’s content or broader questions about political rhetoric.
The incident has prompted reviews of security measures at high-profile gatherings in the nation’s capital. Federal agencies continue to investigate the shooting and the suspect’s background. No further details on potential legal or professional consequences related to public statements have been announced.
You're Disgraceful!' Trump Destroys Lefty Journalist to Her Face Over WHCD Shooter Remark
Washington D.C. — President Donald Trump has strongly criticized CBS News anchor Norah O’Donnell following an interview on “60 Minutes” in which O’Donnell read part of the manifesto written by the suspect in the White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting.
Trump called the decision “disgraceful.” He stated, “I’m not a king. What I am — if I was a king, I wouldn’t be dealing with you.”
The remarks came after the alleged shooter’s manifesto referenced targeting Trump officials. The document appeared to reference political narratives directed against Trump over the past decade.
Trump argued that the media should hold Democrats accountable for rhetoric that has demonized him with what he described as false allegations. He said the “No Kings” campaign promoted by some on the left is built on the claim that he acts as an absolute authoritarian.
Trump noted that his administration has faced repeated legal challenges in courts, opposition from Congress, and critical media coverage. He contrasted this with the situation of a king or dictator.
The president suggested that if Democrats want to see a genuinely oppressive regime, they should examine the Iranian government. He said Democrats appear reluctant to confront that reality.
Trump stated that after incidents involving political violence, Democrats express opposition to violence and call for unity when the suspect leans left. He said they resume attacks on him after a short period, as seen after previous assassination attempts.
The exchange highlights ongoing tensions between the administration and segments of the media over political rhetoric and its potential impact.
The shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner has prompted reviews of security measures at high-profile events in Washington. Federal agencies continue to investigate the incident and the suspect’s background.
May you like
No further details on potential legal or professional consequences for the interview segment have been announced.
